Template for a Novel
Book Review for Philo Elect
Short Bond Paper, Deadline November 21, 2019
Short Bond Paper, Deadline November 21, 2019
Organizing the Review
https://www.hamilton.edu/academics/centers/writing/writing-resources/book-review
1.
All reviews begin with bibliographic
information: the author’s name, the book’s full title, place of publication,
publisher, edition, date, pagination, and cost, if known.
2.
In no more than two paragraphs, introduce the
book. Give your initial appraisal of the work, including your key observation
on the text. This key observation will be your thesis. Try not to begin with a
flat statement such as “This book is interesting.” Begin with an anecdote, a
challenging quotation, or a key observation.
3.
Follow with descriptive analysis and evaluation
of the text. You may either treat these topics separately, first describing the
book’s contents, the author's argument, presentation, and evidence, and then
offering your own evaluation, or you may weave the two together. In either
case,
a. clearly
set out the author’s purpose in writing the book, and whether or not you think
the author has succeeded.
b. describe
the author’s arguments and the themes of the book, and give your appraisal of
their validity and effectiveness.
c. describe
the sources and evidence the author uses to prove his case, and evaluate their
appropriateness and sufficiency. What are the author's sources? Should the
author have used more, or different, sources?
d. Comment
on the author's organization and writing style.
4.
Conclude. Here you may make more general remarks
about the text and the ideas presented in it. If you have not already done so,
indicate whether you feel the book is worthwhile, and for what audience. Is the
book outstanding? Will it make a lasting contribution to its field, or is it
less satisfactory?
Good evening sir, do we have to right it down ? or we should explain everything orally?
ReplyDeleteI already read it, thank you sir. it`s short bond paper pala..
The Savior Socrates and Sluggish City-State of Athens
ReplyDeleteA. Introduction
1. Background of Socrates
2. Athens and the Sophists
B. Body
3. The God That Guides Socrates
4. Socrates the Gadfly
5. Responsibility and God-Appointedness
6. The Persecution of the Guide
7. Persistence and Death
C. Conclusion
9. Comparison: Socrates and Fr. Roque's Idea of Pagpapatalab
8. Final Remarks on Being Called-Upon
Shariful S. Mansul
AB Philosophy II
Philosophy Elective A
11-28-19
Law Court: An Expert in Distinguishing the Truth or Blinded by the Truth
ReplyDelete•The Athenian Justice System
•The Supreme Court Of the Philippines
•Philosophy of Justice
•Philosophy of Truth
Potenciano, Cyndie Mei J.
AB Philosophy II
Philosophy Elective A
November 28,2019
SOCIAL INJUSTICE ON POVERTY VESUS WEALTH
ReplyDeleteA. Introduction
1. Introduction of Philosophy on Poverty
2. Introduction of Philosophy on Wealth
B. Body
1. Philosophy on Poverty
a. Amartya Sen
b. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon
2. Philosophy on Wealth
a. Thales of Miletus
b. Arthur Schopenhauer
C. Conclusion
a. Comparison on Poverty and Wealth
BABARAN, KEENG VANCE PARTOSA
180816
PHILO ELECT- A
November 28, 2019
Title: Knowing what we do not know
ReplyDeleteKnowing what we know (And what we do not know)
*It seems like we know many facts about ourselves and the world around us, even if there vastly many others we know that we don’t know. But how do we know if what we believe to be true is really knowledge? Can our beliefs be both justified and true, yet still not count as genuine knowledge? If so, then how much confidence should we really have in our beliefs? Is there a way to strike a balance between paralyzing skepticism, on the one hand, and dogmatic conviction, on the other?
* To know what you know and what we do not know, that is true knowledge.
-Confucius
*Socrates said, "All I know is that I know nothing". What I'm trying to figure out is this: if I know NOTHING, how do I KNOW that I know nothing? It just goes round in circles thus becoming nothing more than a paradox.
I am still searching for philosophers to support my study.
Mangubat, Abby Jay B.
180715
PHILO ELECT A
Philosophical Views on Death from the Apology
ReplyDeleteI. Introduction
a.Socrates Background
b. What is Apology?
II. Socrates Views on Death
a. Death is a blessing.
b. Death is like dreamless sleep.
C. Death is a change from here to another place.
III. Conclusion
Mark Anthony T. Betcher
BA. Philo. II
Philo. Elect.
11-28-19
Sipin, Mark
ReplyDelete170052
BA. Philosophy 3rd Year
Philo. Elective
Research Proposal
Suicide
I. Introduction
II. Table of Contents
III. Philosophers Perspectives (Ancient to Contemporary)
The list below (labeled as a to c is an initial only, and the possibilities of adding more ideas are possible) will contain the contents of what, why, how does suicide all about.
a. Philosopher (reference/s below)
b. Philosopher (reference/s below)
c. Philosopher (reference/s below)
IV. Absract
V. Conclusion
VI. Bibliographies/ References/ Philosophers: Fyodor Dostoyevsky; Kant; Camus; Emilie Durkheim; Foucault; Rousseau.
Topic: Moral Integrity
ReplyDeleteI. Introduction
II. Table of Contents
III. Definition of Moral Integrity
IV. Socrates' Background
V. How does Socrates showed his Moral Integrity?
a. Experience of Socrates in Athens
b. Society's Moral Integrity (Greece)
VI. Philosophers perspective of Moral Integrity (Still Looking for a references)
VII. Conclusion
Rago, Jerrold
BA. in Philosophy 2nd Year
Philo. Elective